I agree for National Accident Helpline to contact me.

CLOSE

What is Future Legal Minds?

 

Future Legal Minds is our prestigious annual competition, held to spotlight current law students and legal trainees who demonstrate excellence in their field. It's one of the few broad law essay competitions to be held in the UK.

There are two categories to enter, Undergraduate and Postgraduate. One winner and one runner-up will be selected from each, receiving a glorious prize package and the Future Legal Minds title! Although entries are now closed for the 2023 competition, Future Legal Minds 2024 will soon come around, so make sure to register your interest for next year.

FLM Opens Doors

Success in the legal sector is an ever-changing target that requires experience, connections, profile, and ongoing development. By entering, you will be able to practice your learnings, showcase your current skillset, and identify your areas of improvement. By winning, you will receive a level of status to set you apart from the fierce competition within your sector, which could excel your career from the start. This is a competition that will not only boost your confidence but it will also raise your industry profile and aid future networking, fundamental to any career.

With Future Legal Minds, anything is possible.

2024 Entry Requirements

To enter the Future Legal Minds 2024 competition, you must be aged 18 or over and studying for a legal qualification at an educational institution in the UK.

We welcome entries from undergraduate and postgraduate law students only. Postgraduates are eligible to enter if they are taking a Postgraduate Diploma in Law or other conversion courses, such as a Legal Practice Course, Common Professional Examination or Bar Professional Training course.

Please see the competition's full entry terms & conditions before entering.

 

2023 Winners


Previous Winners - Where Are They Now?

2022 Undergraduate Catagory Winner
Syed Adil, University of Aberdeen

At the time of the competition, Syed was studying a dual degree in Scots and English Law with European Legal Studies. Ultimately, Syed's aspirations were to be called to the Scots and English Bar and develop a career as a cross-border Barrister, utilising his dual-qualifying degree to its full extent.

At the time of the competition, Syed was studying a dual degree in Scots and English Law with European Legal Studies. Ultimately, Syed's aspirations were to be called to the Scots and English Bar and develop a career as a cross-border Barrister, utilising his dual-qualifying degree to its full extent.

2022 Postgraduate Catagory Winner
Matthew Johnson, Oxford Brookes University, University of Exeter

On entry, Matthew was a GDL student at Oxford Brookes University, having previously studied History at the University of Exeter. He aspired to become a barrister and had a keen interest in public and commercial law.

On entry, Matthew was a GDL student at Oxford Brookes University, having previously studied History at the University of Exeter. He aspired to become a barrister and had a keen interest in public and commercial law.

2021 FLM Winner
Elena Michael, BPP University

Alongside her studies in 2021, Elena provided consultancy for children whose own education was impacted by their mental health. She worked as an Applied Behaviour Analysis therapy administrator to support them.

Alongside her studies in 2021, Elena provided consultancy for children whose own education was impacted by their mental health. She worked as an Applied Behaviour Analysis therapy administrator to support them.

2020 FLM Winner
Joseph Kelen, University of Cambridge

Joseph entered FLM whilst studying for his Senior Status Law degree and submitted his essay focussing on his special interest area of Law, vagrancy. He wanted to see change in this area as he argued that the laws were “counterproductive”.

Joseph entered FLM whilst studying for his Senior Status Law degree and submitted his essay focussing on his special interest area of Law, vagrancy. He wanted to see change in this area as he argued that the laws were “counterproductive”.